Global News : Passport : Ricks : Drezner : Walt : Rothkopf : Lynch
The Cable : The AfPak Blog : Net Effect : Shadow Govt. : Madam Secretary : The Call
Why Cuba won't join the OAS

That pesky little detail about "democracy"...
By Lino Gutierrez
On September 11, 2001, minutes after the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, representatives of the Organization of American States (OAS) in Lima, Peru, signed the Inter-American Democratic Charter, a document that established that only democracies could be members of the organization. Last week, representatives of the same organization, which expelled Cuba in 1962, rescinded Cuba's expulsion and invited the hemisphere's lone Marxist dictatorship to return.
What happened in eight years? For one thing, the regional dynamics have shifted. After September 11, many believed that the United States, occupied elsewhere in the world, was paying little attention to its own backyard. Latin American countries, moreover, were never comfortable with the Iraq war. Even Chile and Mexico, usually staunch Washington allies, failed to provide needed votes when the United States sought the U.N. Security Council's approval to take Baghdad. Abu Ghraib, reports of civilian casualties, and George W. Bush's personal unpopularity all contributed to a precipitous drop in the U.S. image across the region.
Things changed for Cuba, too. Once a feared, Soviet-backed promoter of worldwide revolution, the Castro regime got new support thanks to the election of populist leaders like Venezuela's Hugo Chávez, Bolivia's Evo Morales, and Nicaragua's Daniel Ortega -- all of whom are admirers of Fidel. Suddenly, it is politically correct to welcome Cuba back to the family like a prodigal son. Under the leadership of Brazil's President Luiz Inácio "Lula" da Silva, the Rio Group, a collection of Latin American democracies, asked Cuba to join its ranks late last year (Cuba accepted). At least eight hemisphere presidents have visited the island of late, all getting the requisite picture with the ailing Fidel in his track suit (none of these official visitors asks about or visits Cuba's brave dissidents).
In the United States, too, some members of Congress are calling for an end to the 47-year-old trade embargo and travel ban. Although President Barack Obama has affirmed that libertad (freedom) will be the cornerstone of his Cuba policy, he has called for a new approach. Obama fulfilled his campaign promise to lift the Bush administration controls on remittances and travel by Cuban-Americans to visit their relatives in Cuba -- a measure that will mean additional foreign exchange for Cuba. Now, the U.S. president has called for Cuba to reciprocate.
The OAS would have been a great chance for Cuba to do just that. But Cuba won't rejoin the organization, which Fidel Castro once called a "Yankee bordello," anytime soon. The island's leaders did hail the OAS's invitation as a great victory, of course. But becoming an OAS member would subject Cuba to the kind of international scrutiny it has avoided for the past half century. The invitation calls for Cuba to rejoin the organization and commit to its established norms -- including the Democratic Charter. And while Venezuela and its allies would gladly give Cuba a pass, the United States, Canada, and others would require that Cuba at least begin a process that leads toward democracy.
That is a process that Cuba will not undertake so long as the Castro brothers are in charge. Though Fidel is no longer on stage, he continues to influence decisions behind the scenes. Brother Raúl seems to be open to more dialogue with the United States, and many Cubans hoped he was a closet reformer. But after announcing some modest economic reforms in 2008 (Cubans can now stay in tourist hotels), the regime seems to have retrenched and closed ranks, as the recent firing of reform-minded economist Carlos Lage and Foreign Minister Felipe Pérez Roque seems to indicate. Both Fidel and Raul have said that, while they're willing to talk to the United States, the revolution's principles are non-negotiable.
Curiously, the variable in the present equation is none other than Obama. Despite Fidel's boast of having outlasted 10 U.S. presidents, neither he nor Raúl have dared take on the popular U.S. president. Cubans are fascinated with Obama, having been told by the Castros for years that blacks were second-class citizens and that no African-American could ever hope to be in a position of power in the United States. In a country that is 60 percent Afro-Cuban, Obama's very election has sparked new hope among many that things could at last get better. How and when this will happen remains to be seen -- but at least for now, Cuba's future won't be in the OAS.
Lino Gutierrez was the U.S. ambassador to Argentina from 2003 to 2006.
Photo: ADALBERTO ROQUE/AFP/Getty Images






The changing winds of Cuba
How could it not be tempting to respond to this article by Lino Gutierrez after the comment was made some years ago that Fidel Castro called the OAS a "yankee bordello". A more apt description as it was then, one couldn't imagine.
As stated, the 47 year old embargo and travel ban has not brought Cuba to its knees. This action has been one of the most vindictive and petty actions ever taken by the US, which has seen a long list of US Presidents come and go. Due to the influence of the right wing enclaves of mafia connected Cubans who were forced to flee at the time of the new regime, becoming domeciled in Miami, thereby being a voting block that has been important for all candidates to court over this time.
That is just another example of bowing to pressure, in this case voting pressure. Is there any other?
Through these years we have seen the tainted Miami Cubans generate a level of hatred for the 'old country' like no other. These attitudes have been seen openly on TV programs over time and the Miami Herald has become the mouthpiece of these policies of hate. As well, such hatreds have been inculcated in the minds of following generations of Cuban born residents. Very much alive and well in Florida.
It would seem to me that the re-entry of such people into Cuba in whatever form would be something that would certainly be a cause for concern by Castro.
Perhaps to expedite the actions required to embrace Cuba into the OAS, another assassination attempt could be organised. It would be impossible to list the murders and assassinations carried out in the name of the US, through any number of well-funded instrumentalities, all with the imprimatur of 47 years of successive US governments, many of which may have had recent name changes but still with the same evil record and still well funded. See 'School of the Americas' for additional information.
Cuba would not be in any great panic to comply to any restrictive conditions to join OAS. It has proved beyond any doubt that it can weather the 'slings and arrows' of blackmail, economic embargo, assassination attempts and any other number of actions that the fertile minds of the US 'intelligence' community can conjure up.
What a proud record they have.
Most of the Southern American countries have now severed the umbilical cord and have gained levels of independence from US economic blackmail, all of which was predicated in some way or another on the actions of the little island of Cuba.
Quite an achievement.
OAS Did Not Require Cuba to Change Its System
The US, and most of the US press, has an interpretation of what the OAS voted to do which is not shared by the rest of those who participated. Watch the streaming video of the third plenary and make up your own mind.
My analysis at http://thehavananote.com/2009/06/_eduardo_verdugo_ap_san.html which The Argument is welcome to post.
John McAuliff
Fund for Reconciliation and Development